Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Radiol. bras ; 52(2): 97-103, Mar.-Apr. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1002989

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: To improve communication between attending physicians and radiologists by defining which information should be included in radiology reports and which reporting format is preferred by requesting physicians at a university hospital. Materials and Methods: Respondents were asked to choose among reports with different formats and levels of detail, related to three hypothetical cases, and questioned as to which characteristics commonly found in radiology reports are appropriate for inclusion. To assign the absolute order of preference of the different reports, the Kemeny-Young method was used. Results: Ninety-nine physicians completed the questionnaires (40.4% were resident physicians; 31.3% were preceptors of residency programs; and 28.3% were professors of medicine). For ultrasound with normal findings, ultrasound showing alterations, and computed tomography, respectively, 54%, 59%, and 53% of the respondents chose structured reports with an impression or comment. According to the respondents, the characteristics that should be included in the radiology report are the quality of the image, details of the clinical presentation, diagnostic impression, examination technique, and information about contrast administration, selected by 92%, 91%, 89%, 72%, and 68%, respectively. Other characteristics that were considered important were recommendations on follow-up and additional radiological or non-radiological investigation. Conclusion: Requesting physicians apparently prefer structured reports with a radiologist impression or comment. Information such as the quality of the examination, the contrast agent used, and suggestions regarding follow-up and additional investigation are valued.


Resumo Objetivo: Melhorar a comunicação entre médicos assistentes e radiologistas, definindo quais informações deveriam ser incluídas num relatório radiológico e qual o formato preferido dos solicitantes de um hospital universitário. Materiais e Métodos: Os participantes foram convidados a escolher a opção preferida entre relatórios com diferentes formatos e níveis de detalhamento de três casos hipotéticos e questionados se características comumente encontradas em um laudo radiológico são apropriadas ou não para inclusão. Para atribuição da ordem absoluta de preferência dos diferentes relatórios, o método Kemeny-Young foi utilizado. Resultados: Noventa e nove médicos responderam os questionários (40,4% médicos residentes, 31,3% preceptores dos programas de residência e 28,3% professores da faculdade de medicina). Laudos estruturados com impressão ou comentário foram selecionados nas situações de ultrassonografia normal por 54% dos participantes, ultrassonografia alterada por 59% e tomografia computadorizada por 53%. As informações que deveriam ser incluídas, de acordo com os solicitantes, foram qualidade da imagem (92%), detalhes do cenário clínico (91%), impressão diagnóstica (89%), técnica do exame (72%), informações sobre meio de contraste (68%). Opiniões sobre seguimento e investigação radiológica ou não radiológica se mostraram importantes. Conclusão: Relatórios estruturados com impressão ou comentário de um radiologista são prepostos. Informações como qualidade de exame, meio de contraste utilizado e sugestões de acompanhamento e investigação adicional são valorizadas pelos médicos solicitantes.


Subject(s)
Research Personnel/psychology , Lobbying , Research Personnel/economics , Research Support as Topic/economics , Research Support as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Canada , Federal Government
2.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 143(1): 7-13, ene. 2015. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-742545

ABSTRACT

Background: The purpose of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment is to achieve resolution of symptoms and remission of disease with a minimum of adverse events (AE). Aim: To report AE of different prescriptions used for the treatment of IBD. Material and Methods: Analysis of a registry of patients with IBD held at a private clinic from 1976 to 2013. All used medications, the occurrence and severity of AE were recorded. Results: The records of 346 patients aged 16 to 86 years, 74% with ulcerative colitis, were analyzed. The most commonly type of medications prescribed were 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs) in 329 patients (92%), followed by adrenal steroids in 218 (61%). Forty nine AE were recorded in the same number of patents (14%). These were more common in patients with Crohn disease (n = 19, 21%). An univariate analysis, demonstrated that extra-intestinal manifestations, hospitalizations secondary to IBD crisis, requirement of surgery and treatment with steroids, immunosuppressants or biologic agents were significantly associated with the presence of AE. AEs were more common with immunosuppressants, followed by 5-ASAs and steroids. Discontinuation of therapy was required in 79, 100 and 43% of patients taking these medications, respectively. Twenty percent of AEs were severe. Leukopenia and pancytopenia along with alopecia were the most common AEs attributable to azathioprine. Conclusions: The occurrence of AEs in patients with IBD is uncommon. Even inmunosuppressants or biologic agents have a low rate of AE and most of them mild.


Subject(s)
Humans , Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Dermatology/organization & administration , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Patient Selection , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Support as Topic/organization & administration , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Biomedical Research/economics , Cellulitis/prevention & control , Cooperative Behavior , Dermatology/economics , Eczema/prevention & control , United Kingdom , Interinstitutional Relations , Leg , Multicenter Studies as Topic/economics , Organizational Objectives , Program Evaluation , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/economics , Research Personnel/economics , Research Personnel/organization & administration , Water Softening
5.
Braz. dent. j ; 19(3): 252-256, 2008. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-495982

ABSTRACT

The present study analyzed the profile of dental researchers receiving grants related to their productivity in research from the Brazilian National Research and Development Council (CNPq). Data collection was carried out in March 2008, using the Brazilian database for curriculum vitae (Lattes Format). There were 144 researchers registered in the database and linked to 25 institutions. These researchers published a total of 12,997 full-text articles, 6,927 of which were published in the last 5 years. Category 1 grant holders (n=77) were responsible for 53.5 percent of this production; Category 2 grant holders (n=65) were responsible for 45.1 percent; Senior grant holders (n=2) were responsible for 1.4 percent. Regarding institutional affiliation, 90.3 percent of the research grants holders develop activities at public institutions and 9.7 percent develop activities in private institutions. Furthermore, 84.0 percent of the researchers are linked to institutions located in the southeast region of Brazil and 75.0 percent of the researchers perform their activities in the state of São Paulo. This study performed a mapping of the distribution of CNPq researchers, revealing a concentration in the southeast region of the country, especially in the state of São Paulo. The findings of the present study also demonstrate the important contribution of grant holders to the scientific production in dentistry in Brazil.


Este estudo teve como objetivo verificar o perfil dos pesquisadores de Odontologia, bolsistas de produtividade em pesquisa, do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento e Pesquisa (CNPq). A coleta dos dados foi realizada em março de 2008, a partir da base de dados do curriculum vitae (Plataforma Lattes). Observou-se que estavam registrados 144 pesquisadores vinculados a 25 instituições brasileiras de ensino e pesquisa. Esses pesquisadores publicaram um total de 12.997 artigos completos, sendo 6.927 produzidos nos últimos 5 anos. Os bolsistas da categoria 1 (n=77) foram responsáveis por 53,5 por cento dessa produção, os da categoria 2 (n=65) por 45,1 por cento e os bolsistas seniores (n=2) por 1,4 por cento. Em relação ao vínculo institucional, 90,3 por cento dos pesquisadores bolsistas desenvolvem suas atividades em instituições públicas e 9,7 por cento em instituições privadas. Observou-se ainda que 84,0 por cento dos pesquisadores estão vinculados a instituições localizadas na região sudeste do Brasil, sendo que do total dos pesquisadores, 75,0 por cento atuam no Estado de São Paulo. Este estudo demonstrou a importante contribuição dos bolsistas para a produção científica da área. Ademais, possibilitou o mapeamento da distribuição desses pesquisadores, evidenciando a concentração dos mesmos na região sudeste do país, especialmente no Estado de São Paulo.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Dental Research , Research Personnel , Research Support as Topic , Bibliometrics , Brazil , Databases as Topic , Dental Research/economics , Dental Research/organization & administration , Efficiency, Organizational , Organizational Affiliation , Periodicals as Topic , Private Sector , Public Sector , Publishing , Research Personnel/economics , Research Personnel/organization & administration , Research Support as Topic/economics , Research Support as Topic/organization & administration , Universities
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL